Anja Wildgruber vs Karla Bartel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Bartel has been winning a higher percentage of points on their second serve at 40.22%, compared to Wildgruber's 35.15% over the past six months. Does this give Bartel an edge? It appears so.
• In returning their opponent's second serves, Wildgruber leads with a win rate of 51.88%, surpassing Bartel's 46.3%.
• When it comes to handling first serve returns, both players are close, with Bartel at 36.7% and Wildgruber at 36.08%.
• Bartel demonstrates a stronger ability to save breakpoints under pressure, achieving 58.82% compared to Wildgruber's 47.87%.
• Within the last year, Bartel has a slightly better match win percentage at 50%, whereas Wildgruber has managed 45.9%.
• Bartel excels on hard surfaces with a 71% win record, whereas Wildgruber's best is on indoor hard courts at 75%.
• Both players frequently compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, but Bartel has a better win rate of 63.64% compared to Wildgruber’s 46.43% in these events.
• In direct encounters, Wildgruber has the upper hand, having won their sole match against Bartel and leading in total set wins 2-1.
• Bartel and Wildgruber had only one match reach a deciding set, where Wildgruber emerged victorious.
• When facing opponents, Bartel typically competes against higher-ranked players, with an average opponent rank of 275.07 versus Wildgruber's 394.25.
• If this encounter extends into a deciding set, Wildgruber shines with a 69% win rate compared to Bartel's 33%.
• Wildgruber surpasses Bartel in converting breakpoints, achieving a success rate of 51.52% against Bartel’s 37.5%.

Editorial Prediction (May 28, 2025, UTC):

Taking into account recent performance metrics, Bartel displays a strong second serve performance, which is a valuable asset in maintaining service games. Additionally, Bartel’s capability to save breakpoints under pressure might prove beneficial in crucial moments of the match.

In contrast, Wildgruber showcases a notable proficiency in returning second serves, which could potentially put pressure on Bartel's serve. Furthermore, Wildgruber's efficiency in break point conversion suggests an advantage when presented with opportunities to close games.

Although Bartel plays against higher-ranked opponents and has a better record on hard surfaces, Wildgruber holds the advantage in head-to-head matches and deciding set performances.

Based on these observations and considering Wildgruber's strengths in specific match situations, Wildgruber is slightly favored to clinch the victory in this upcoming match.